Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Surgery ; 173(3): 732-738, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36280511

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although ventral hernias are common in older adults and can impair quality of life, multiple barriers exist that preclude ventral hernia repair. The goal of this study was to determine if older adults with ventral hernias achieve surgeon-directed goals to progress to an elective ventral hernia repair. METHODS: Patients ≥60 years evaluated for a ventral hernia in a specialty clinic from January 2018 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Nonoperative candidates with modifiable risk factors were included. Data collected included specific barriers to ventral hernia repair and recommendations to address these barriers for future ventral hernia repair eligibility. Patients lost to follow-up were contacted by phone. RESULTS: In total, 559 patients were evaluated, with 182 (32.6%) deemed nonoperative candidates with modifiable risk factors (median age 68 years, body mass index 38.2). Surgeon-directed recommendations included weight loss (53.8%), comorbidity management by a medical specialist (44.0%), and smoking cessation (19.2%). Ultimately, 45/182 patients (24.7%) met preoperative goals and progressed to elective ventral hernia repair. Alternatively, 5 patients (2.7%) required urgent/emergency surgical intervention. Importantly, 106/182 patients (58.2%) did not return to clinic after initial consultation. Of those contacted (n = 62), 35.5% reported failure to achieve optimization goals. Initial body mass index ≥40 and surgeon-recommended weight loss were associated with lack of patient follow-up (P = .01, P = .02) and progression to elective ventral hernia repair (P = .009, P = .005). CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of older adults evaluated for ventral hernias were nonoperative candidates, most often due to obesity, and over half of these patients were lost to follow-up. An increase in structured support is needed for patients to achieve surgeon-specified preoperative goals.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Objetivos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología
2.
Surg Endosc ; 36(11): 8387-8396, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35182214

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernias are common in older adults, and may be repaired via a transversus abdominus release (TAR). Older adults undergoing surgery have unique age-related risk factors, including polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in older adults and is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. Our aim was to examine the prevalence and association of polypharmacy with clinical outcomes in older adults undergoing a TAR. METHODS: Patients 60 years and older who underwent elective open or robotic bilateral TAR were included in the study. Average daily medications taken preoperatively was collected and stratified by tertiles. Baseline demographic data, peri- and postoperative outcomes, and 30-day outcomes were collected. RESULTS: There were 132 total patients with an average age of 67.8 years. The number of daily medications ranged from 0 to 28, with an overall mean of 11.2 medications. Patients in tertile 1 took an average of 5.3 medications, tertile 2 10.5 medications, and tertile 3 17.9 medications. Patients in tertile 3 had more than double the rate of in-hospital complications (0.7) compared to tertiles 1 and 2 (0.3 and 0.3, respectively; p = 0.03). A greater number of daily medications was independently associated with postoperative delirium [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.3], cardiac events (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.3), ICU stay (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.3), and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy was very common in older adults undergoing a TAR, and was associated with in-hospital complications, postoperative delirium, cardiac events, ICU stay, length of stay, and discharge to a SNF. Additional study is needed to assess if preoperative interventions to limit polypharmacy will improve outcomes for older adults undergoing a TAR.


Asunto(s)
Delirio , Hernia Ventral , Humanos , Anciano , Polifarmacia , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Delirio/epidemiología
4.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol ; 7(12): 2475-2480, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33150749

RESUMEN

Antemortem tau positron emission tomography imaging suggests elevated tau pathology in autosomal dominant versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease at equivalent clinical stages, but does not implicate the specific tau pathologies responsible. Here we made stereological measurements of tau neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques, and neuropil threads and found compared to late-onset Alzheimer's disease, autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease showed even greater tangle and thread burdens. Regional tau burden resembled that observed in tau imaging of a separate cohort at earlier clinical stages. Finally, our results suggest tau imaging measures total tau burden in Alzheimer's disease, composed predominantly of tangle and thread pathology.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Lóbulo Frontal , Lóbulo Parietal , Proteínas tau/metabolismo , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Autopsia , Carbolinas , Femenino , Lóbulo Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Lóbulo Frontal/metabolismo , Lóbulo Frontal/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lóbulo Parietal/diagnóstico por imagen , Lóbulo Parietal/metabolismo , Lóbulo Parietal/patología , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiofármacos
6.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 34(2): 112-117, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31725472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The AD8 informant-based screening instrument has been validated with molecular biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD) but not with the gold standard of neuropathologic AD. The objective of this study was to validate the AD8 with neuropathologic AD and compare its predictive performance with that of the Mini-Mental State Examination and both participant-derived and informant-derived subjective memory complaint (SMC) regarding the participant. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University included 230 participants, ages 50 to 91 years, who later had a neuropathologic examination. Four dementia screening instruments from their baseline assessment were evaluated: the AD8, Mini-Mental State Examination, participant SMC, and informant SMC. The primary outcome was a neuropathologic diagnosis of AD. RESULTS: The average participant age at baseline was 80.4 years, 48% were female. All 4 dementia screening tests were predictive of neuropathologic AD. There was no significant difference in the predictive performance of the AD8 compared with the other instruments, but the AD8 had superior sensitivity and combined positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSION: The AD8 is a brief and sensitive screening instrument that may facilitate earlier and more accurate AD diagnosis in a variety of care settings.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Neuropatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Autopsia , Estudios de Cohortes , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(12): 2243-2248, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246863

RESUMEN

Improving quality and delivery of care for people with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) requires a comprehensive research agenda that encompasses the entire care continuum. Logistical and ethical challenges of informed consent for research participation of persons with ADRD include determination of capacity to consent, surrogate consent when capacity to consent is compromised, timely identification of the legally authorized representative (LAR) providing surrogate consent, and balancing residual autonomy with surrogate consent. Short stays; limited access to patients, caregivers, and LARs; and fluctuating influences of acute illness on capacity determination compound these challenges in the acute care setting. To address these challenges, we worked with the University of Wisconsin Health Sciences Institutional Review Board to develop a procedural framework for obtaining informed consent from hospitalized individuals with ADRD and their caregivers to participate in a minimal risk care intervention. The framework is specially designed for minimal risk situations in which rapid enrollment is a necessity and uses rapid identification of surrogates to consent for patients who lack legal capacity to make medical decisions, indicated by an activated healthcare power of attorney, and individualized formal assent procedures for patients who lack capacity to consent. These methods were proven effective in facilitating hospital-based recruitment in an ongoing randomized controlled trial and provide a basis for increasing access to acute care clinical research for persons with ADRD. Bolstering research participation through more easily used consent procedures during acute illness is critical to fostering improvements in the delivery of high-quality care to persons with ADRD. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2243-2248, 2018.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Hospitales , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuidadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tutores Legales
8.
Acad Emerg Med ; 25(8): 880-890, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29575587

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Syncope and near-syncope are common in patients with dementia and a leading cause of emergency department (ED) evaluation and subsequent hospitalization. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical trajectory and short-term outcomes of patients who presented to the ED with syncope or near-syncope and were assessed by their ED provider to have dementia. METHODS: This multisite prospective cohort study included patients 60 years of age or older who presented to the ED with syncope or near-syncope between 2013 and 2016. We analyzed a subcohort of 279 patients who were identified by the treating ED provider to have baseline dementia. We collected comprehensive patient-level, utilization, and outcomes data through interviews, provider surveys, and chart abstraction. Outcome measures included serious conditions related to syncope and death. RESULTS: Overall, 221 patients (79%) were hospitalized with a median length of stay of 2.1 days. A total of 46 patients (16%) were diagnosed with a serious condition in the ED. Of the 179 hospitalized patients who did not have a serious condition identified in the ED, 14 (7.8%) were subsequently diagnosed with a serious condition during the hospitalization, and an additional 12 patients (6.7%) were diagnosed postdischarge within 30 days of the index ED visit. There were seven deaths (2.5%) overall, none of which were cardiac-related. No patients who were discharged from the ED died or had a serious condition in the subsequent 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with perceived dementia who presented to the ED with syncope or near-syncope were frequently hospitalized. The diagnosis of a serious condition was uncommon if not identified during the initial ED assessment. Given the known iatrogenic risks of hospitalization for patients with dementia, future investigation of the impact of goals of care discussions on reducing potentially preventable, futile, or unwanted hospitalizations while improving goal-concordant care is warranted.

9.
J Oncol Pract ; 12(6): e643-53, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27143146

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The importance of high-quality, timely lung cancer care and the need to have indicators to measure timeliness are increasingly discussed in the United States. This study explored when and why delays occur in lung cancer care and compared timeliness between two states with divergent disease incidence. METHODS: Patients with small-cell or non-small-cell lung cancer were recruited through cancer centers, outpatient clinics, and community approaches, and interviewed over the phone. Statistical analysis of patient-reported dates included descriptive statistics and comparing time intervals between states and across the sites with Mann-Whitney U tests. Additionally, data from patients with longer timelines were qualitatively analyzed to identify possible reasons for delays. RESULTS: On the basis of the dates reported by 275 patients, the median time from first presentation to a clinician to treatment was 52 days; 29% of patients experienced a wait of 90 days or more. Median times for key intervals were 36.5 days from abnormal radiograph to treatment, 9.5 days from initial presentation to specialist referral, 15 days from patient informed of diagnosis to first therapy, and 16 days from referral to treatment to first therapy. More than one quarter of patients perceived delays in care. No significant differences in length of time intervals were identified between states. Monitoring of small nodules, missed diagnosis, and other reasons for longer timelines were documented. CONCLUSION: Results defined typical time to treatment of patients with lung cancer across a variety of health systems and should facilitate establishing metrics for determining timeliness of lung cancer care.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos
10.
J Palliat Med ; 18(7): 601-12, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25879990

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rehospitalizations are prevalent and associated with decreased quality of life. Although hospice has been advocated to reduce rehospitalizations, it is not known how area-level hospice utilization patterns affect rehospitalization risk. OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to examine the association between hospice enrollment, local hospice utilization patterns, and 30-day rehospitalization in Medicare patients. METHODS: With a retrospective cohort design, 1,997,506 hospitalizations were assessed between 2005 and 2009 from a 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Local hospice utilization was defined using tertiles representing the percentage of all deaths occurring in hospice within each Hospital Service Area (HSA). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship between 30-day rehospitalization, hospice enrollment, and local hospice utilization, adjusting for patient sociodemographics, medical history, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Rates of patients dying in hospice were 27% in the lowest hospice utilization tertile, 41% in the middle tertile, and 53% in the highest tertile. Patients enrolled in hospice had lower rates of 30-day rehospitalization than those not enrolled (2.2% versus 18.8%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.118-0.131). Patients residing in areas of low hospice utilization were at greater rehospitalization risk than those residing in areas of high utilization (19.1% versus 17.5%; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), which persisted beyond that accounted for by individual hospice enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Area-level hospice utilization is inversely proportional to rehospitalization rates. This relationship is not fully explained by direct hospice enrollment, and may reflect a spillover effect of the benefits of hospice extending to nonenrollees.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...